BYOD - CJIS MOBILE APPENDIX - FBI

Bring Your Own (BYO) what?

Take away the scenario of government and local authorities involvement and merely consider private industry then the latter may have no enforcement rights to control BYOD (bring your own device) smartphone usage as these employees and out-source workers are being used and are paying for company communications out of their wages/salary merely so that a natural business

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IM Telegram Replay Attack - Android

Hopefully, readers will have had the opportunity and time to read about WhatsApp here at the trewmte.blogspot: WhatsApp network forensics - http://trewmte.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/whatsapp-network-forensics.htmlWhisper Signal WhatsApp - http://trewmte.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/whisper-signal-whatsapp.html So it's time to move on to the next instant messaging app known as Telegram. It is relevant to
Read more

Appeal case - Boardman - phone evidence/cell site

The serving of evidence and arbitrarily what should be served or should be not served is highlighted in this Appeal case. It is noted the Appeal Court dealt with issues surrounding making burdensome requests for evidence from the police. I suspect the comments of the Appeal Court could be misconstrued meaning there is a potential for further hearings as to relevance of evidence. The Appeal Court
Read more

WhatsApp network forensics

With many companies allowing employees to use their own smartphones in the workplace it has been noted confidential information maybe being unwitting leaked as users take to using their smartphone cameras to take photos of Whiteboard content, potentially risking disclosure (mentioned by the Information Security Community). Smartphones can also scan data, reducing the need for organisation to
Read more